Legislature(2001 - 2002)
02/11/2002 01:32 PM Senate JUD
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 223-PRISONERS:PAROLE/GOOD TIME SENATOR DONLEY, Sponsor SB 223, explained it was a revisit to an issue. The intent of the legislation is to increase the percentage of incarcerated individuals in Alaska that at the time they are released would at least have their General Equivalency Diploma (GED). The public policy reasoning behind it was that studies had shown the number one factor in recidivism on the part of released prisoners from correctional facilities is their ability to read and write, their educational level, which makes common sense. The inability to read and write greatly inhibits their ability to find a job and meaningful employment. People that come out of the correctional facilities with a GED are going to have a better chance in the future to sustain themselves and find jobs and get employment. He explained the Sponsor Substitute version, in the packet, would th allow prisoners, who failed to get their GED, 1/12 of the good rd time sentence reduction instead of the current statutory 1/3 sentence reduction available to them. The proposed Committee th Substitute (CS) would allow them to get 1/6 of their good time rdth sentence reduction as opposed to 1/3. With the 1/6 they would be eligible for half of their statutory good time sentence reduction if they failed to get their GED. He said that was about 17%, which is very close to the national standard of 15% that had been adopted by 30 states and the federal government as a minimum time prisoners are suppose to serve. Alaska currently had a very generous good time law, twice the national standard. For people who don't get their GED it would be more generous than the national standard by 2%. He said with the understanding that is what the proposed CS would do, he moved the CS be adopted. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said the motion was for the committee to adopt the document 2/5/02, 97/J. Hearing no objection CSSSSB 223 (JUD) was adopted. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked if two people go to jail, one had not accomplished his graduation from High School or a GED and the other one had graduated from High School, how would this effect them. SENATOR DONLEY answered anyone who had graduated or had a GED rd would still be eligible for the full 1/3 off for good time. Those people who had not would have to get their GED, unless they fit the exemption criteria, before they would be eligible for the rd full 1/3. If they did not they would only be eligible for th 1/6. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked for whom he had exemption criteria. SENATOR DONLEY explained the exemption criteria included people who are mentally of physically incapable of obtaining a diploma or its equivalency, they don't speak English as their primary language, or due to the prisoners age or social background the commissioner determines the prisoner cannot reasonably be expected to meet that educational requirement. CANDACE BROWER, Program Coordinator Department of Corrections (DOC), said DOC also believes that education is an important factor in rehabilitation of offenders and they take that mission very seriously. DOC is opposed to SB 223 primarily because it would increase costs for the state they do not think necessary. They have in place educational programs in all of their facilities. They provide adult basic education, which is literacy programming as well as GED, Vocational Rehabilitation and other educational programs. She thought they did a pretty good job. She explained at Lemon Creek they have what is called a GED Dorm. When offenders are incarcerated at Lemon Creek the probation officer meets with the offender to determine what kind of schooling they have. If they say they have a GED or a diploma that is verified, particularly if they are going to get into taking away good time. If they need to get a GED or diploma they go into what is called the GED Dorm. In that dorm there is no television and no extra benefits and during the week they are required to study and prepare for the GED. People in this program who are unable, and there are a large number of offenders who are unable to reach the sixth grade level, don't go to that dorm because it would not be appropriate for them to be in that particular group. She gave that as one example of the things they do to provide education to offenders. She explained at Spring Creek Correctional Center they have a youth offender program. They have a separate unit for youthful offenders and one of the requirements of that program is they attend school. They are in school everyday. The schooling is provided by the Kenai School District. They also have had commencement ceremonies at Highland Mountain Correctional Center for the women. They celebrate people's successes in education and take it very seriously. MS. BROWER explained this would be a more punitive angle toward receiving education and they believe, as does most of the educational community, incentive is a better way to go. Most other correctional places do incentives such as provide additional visitation, increased telephone calls, payment to attend school and give additional time off to somebody who achieves their diploma of GED rather that take away what other people would ordinarily receive. DOC preferred that method and she thought that would be less costly with the same result as SB 223. She said the committee was aware DOC facilities suffered from overcrowding and there were over 700 inmates in Arizona. When DOC met in 2002 in front of the House Finance Committee they had 300 more offenders incarcerated than the previous year. She thought some increase in numbers had to do with legislation enacted that increased misdemeanor offenses to felony offenses and lengthened sentences. She thought the bill would increase sentences for people who would not be committing further crimes. DOC simply did not have room for an increased population and they were doing a good job. MS. BROWER discussed another problem. On January 1, 2002 the GED testing had been completely overhauled. Tests taken before January 1 would not count towards a GED unless they had completed st their GED by December 31. Everyone as of January 1 had to start over again. They were not sure of the effect of the new test because it is a more rigorous program and battery. They did not know what kind of an effect that is going to have on the offenders and how well they are going to be able to succeed. She was concerned about litigation. If there was a liberty interest involved, offenders who are violated for not getting their GED or diploma would likely go before the Parole Board for a revocation hearing which would require the use of a Public Defender and cause other problems. She was concerned that many of their offenders are subject to court ordered treatment programs such as substance abuse treatment, sex offender treatment, and batterers programs. Some of the programs are full time and require the complete attention of the offender. She asked if this legislation would interfere with their court ordered treatment. For example if someone is court ordered to do sex offender treatment and they also have this legislation hanging over their head would they have to choose sex offender treatment over getting their education. Or if they were court ordered into substance abuse treatment would they have to choose getting sober or getting an education. She was not sure how that would affect people who already had court orders for other important treatment. She appreciated Senator Donley's Committee Substitute that would th increase the percentage of good time to 1/6. She said when somebody is on mandatory parole often times that is the only supervision they have when they are released. With reduced good time they would not be on supervision as long as they would have otherwise. With the problem of overcrowding if there is a way that offenders can get back into the community safely on supervision she thought that was a preferred method. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said DOC was using all the different carrot devises as incentives to get their GED. MS. BROWER said they do encourage people to get their GED but they certainly do not give them extra privileges or extra time off. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said they were not using any of the carrot devises or very few of them that other states are using such as paying people to get their GEDs, giving them extra time off once they get one, giving them additional privileges that they might not have in the institution because they have accomplished that. He asked what incentives were DOC using, just saying it is a good idea to get their GED and they would provide some help. MS. BROWER answered she was not sure what everybody does in each institution but it is required at Spring Creek in the youthful offender program to be in school or they can not be in that program. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said that was only for people under a certain age. MS. BROWER believed it was twenty-two. At Lemon Creek it is a requirement that they be in the GED Dorm if they are capable. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said he knew it was required but it was like prison work programs. There is no requirement to work, it is provided for them and many choose to do it because it gives them some activity during the day. MS. BROWER said one of the things they do get if they get a GED is television, whether that is a good incentive or not. Sometimes people are encouraged to do better just because it is better for them. They actually do want to get better. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked if they had any negative incentive right now. He asked if failure to get their GED had absolutely no impact one way or the other on the amount of time they are going to serve, when they are going to get out, or their conditions of probation. MS. BROWER said no although conditions of probation generally have an educational requirement if the judge deems that necessary as do conditions of parole. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked the percentage of people currently released from our institutions that did not have a GED. MS. BROWER said she was not sure. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked if she knew whether DOC was measuring or keeping track of educational levels, whether they were achieving something within the institution, and how many they were releasing that did not avail themselves of these program. MS. BROWER said not availing themselves of the program is probably a difficult question to answer. She had some statistics for how many people were enrolled in GED programming in 2000, 2001 and the first six months of 2002. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said some take advantage of it and the legislature had put money into the program to make certain there were funds available so people could get learning opportunities while incarcerated. He asked of those released what percentage did not have their GED other than the excused group. He asked what percentage of the group of people Senator Donley had targeted with the bill were not entering into the programs and probably would not without some additional incentive. MS. BROWER said she was not sure they had an answer to that question. She was not sure whether or not they track. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked if the new GED testing requirement related in anyway to the testing requirements imposed by the legislature on high school students. MS. BROWER answered GED testing is nationwide. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said it was terrific they had an institution in the state that was using a national test that could be verified and validated. He noted she had said litigation might be a problem. He said this legislation would only apply to people being sentenced after it takes effect. So it would be some years out before there would be a significant fiscal impact. He noted the DOC fiscal note was $60,000 going to $708,000. He said the $60,000 was contractual and in 2007 there would be a very large impact. He said that would be people who refused to go through the program and DOC would have to keep them longer. SENATOR DONLEY said a new fiscal note on the Committee Substitute had not been done. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked if the increased cost was because DOC sensed they would be keeping some people in prison longer and it would be more expensive than having them on probation. MS. BROWER said that was right. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked if they had higher recidivism rates because inmates did not have a GED. He asked if DOC wouldn't want to keep them longer because they are the ones that are more likely to offend if turned loose. MS. BROWER said she supposed they would want to keep them longer she just did not know how affective punishment was as opposed to positive reinforcement. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said Ms. Brower was concerned if they kept them longer there would be a shorter period of parole. He asked if that was a cost concern or a rehabilitation concern. MS. BROWER said it was a rehabilitation concern. SENATOR THERRIAULT wanted to know if Senator Donley had information on why those that have a GED have a lower recidivism rate. Was it because they got an education or are those people who naturally move up into the GED already less inclined to be repeat offenders. SENATOR DONLEY said he did not know. He explained in national studies it is very clear that the number one correlating fact of a person's recidivism is whether they can read and write. It could be when they were first incarcerated they were a better candidate for rehabilitation in the first place. It could be that when they get out they can actually get a job because they can read and write or it might be a combination of all those things. It was nationally recognized that education is the number one factor in success of not committing another crime when released from a correctional institution. SENATOR THERRIAULT noted Ms. Brower said the bill designated who would check the prisoner's high school or GED records but had indicated DOC already does that. MS. BROWER said the Lemon Creek Correctional Center did but was not sure if they did Department wide. If they require a prisoner to prove they have their GED or diploma DOC will be doing that. SENATOR THERRIAULT asked Senator Donley, since the fiscal note was written to the original bill, did he have an idea how the Committee Substitute would impact those numbers. SENATOR DONLEY said the number as far as time of incarceration would be halved so the $341,300 would be $170,000. The first $5,500 was contractual services to administer the test of basic education. This legislation puts the burden on the inmate to come forward and show proof they already have their GED. They could wipe that cost out by placing the burden on the inmate. He said it sounded like they were already doing that at Spring Creek and wanted to know what they were doing at the other facilities. They would have to see how Spring Creek does it and how much it cost them there. He said there was an estimated $46,800 in contractual service for additional teaching and tutoring services in addition to current expenditures. He said that might be a legitimate cost and probably worth it because there is nothing in the fiscal note anticipating the savings on the back end for the decreased recidivism. He addressed the issues brought up by Ms. Brower. He said the st January 1 GED testing did not have anything to do with the bill other than it might be a little bit tougher to get a GED in the future in Alaska. He said the issue of being violated for not getting a GED was reverse thinking. The bill said they get 1/6 unless they get rd their GED then they get 1/3 off. The Department was in the mentality that somehow it is the right of prisoners to have the rd 1/3 good time. He thought that was reverse thinking. Good time should be a reward for good behavior and this is part of the good behavior so it is not taking it away from them it is what they didn't get. He said the issue of conflict with other court orders, they have 24 hours locked up in prison, so unless they are all consuming, not being able to take sex offender or alcohol treatment and go to school seemed inconsistent and not a very persuasive argument. He said a lot of people do it on the Internet and don't have to have special classes to do it. SENATOR DONLEY addressed the idea that they would be cutting down on time in the community for assessment and transition. He said good time was never intended for that function. That is what parole is intended to do and that is up to judges who can issue mandatory parole. If the judges know that getting a GED may affect the total amount of good time they should be sentencing people to a certain amount of parole to give them transition time into the community. He said it is really bad public policy to assume good time is given to everybody so the only way we can have a supervised period to go back in society is if they give them good time. He thought good time should be given as a reward for good behavior and not because they want an integration period back into society. Mandatory parole should be part of the judicial function and require a period of supervision. SENATOR COWDERY thought education helped the parolees to adjust to the outside environment. The prisons are already overcrowded. He asked if they had any figures on what percentage return in connection with their education level. MS. BROWER said she did not have any numbers on that. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked if DOC did not track any of that. MS. BROWER said they are implementing a new data gathering system that will track information much better than they have been able to do in the past. They hoped to be able to track those things more closely. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said the question was based on the statistic that nationally those who cannot read or write have a greater propensity to repeat and return to institutions. Senator Cowdery was asking how many of these folks are coming back and at what levels over a given period of time. He thought they needed to find and utilize every technique they could to make certain that a person having once been in an institution never wanted to come back again and maybe modified their life style and life choices so they did not come back again. MS. BROWER said how many come back because they don't have their education is a complicated question. How many come back because they have a substance abuse problem or other issues that have not been dealt with may be more critical in Alaska because that is a tremendous problem they try to address on a regular basis. BRUCE RICHARDS, Special Assistant, Office of the Commissioner DOC, said Senator Donley mentioned what is known around the country as "truth in sentencing" where DOC in Alaska is required to provide a 33% mandatory parole. Some states have a 15%. Even though Alaska is more generous in their good time the sentences here are longer. Last August when the Department of Justice came out with their statistics most of the states in the country actually had a decline in their prisoner population and Alaska was one of five that had an increase. They had 300 more people than at that time last year. He pointed out that in the testimony on SB 242, Concealed Handguns people were talking about crime reduction. If that was the case the populations were still rising in DOC. There are some things that are different in Alaska and he believed it was sentencing. MR. RICHARDS said with the Committee Substitute the incarceration costs under FY 06, 07 and 08 would change. The $341,000 would become $175,000 and the $648,000 would also be $175,000. There was a holding over of people on the second year that would no th longer exist under the 1/6. The total number in FY 06 would be $235,300 and hold the rest of the way out. He wanted to respond to Senator Taylor's question about what DOC does for incentives. Television was called an incentive but it actually was something that everybody had. Senator Donley's No Frills Prison Bill removed that portion so now in order for an inmate to have television they would have to obtain a GED or diploma. SENATOR DONLEY said everybody in Alaska correctional facilities had access to common area television. The provision was whether or not they have a television in their own cell. MR. RICHARDS discussed spitting time between court ordered programming and getting a GED on the Internet. A piece of the No Frills Bill specified inmates are not allowed to have a connection to the Internet. SENATOR DONLEY said that was a connection to the Internet in their own cell and they still have access to computers in common areas. MR. RICHARDS said they do not provide Internet at all. SENATOR DONLEY said they could access computers and have a program like a CD Rom that had what they needed to get their GED in a common teaching area. MR. RICHARDS said they could do that in places where they had computers. He thought they did that in some places. He said because of overcrowding people are transported and moved all the time just to keep the facilities at their caps as much as they can. They are not able to do that everyday but everything is interrupted all the time. He noticed the bill allowed, under section (A) page 2 lines 12 & 13 "if the program is made available". One of their big problems was the constant moving of prisoners to maintain the population at different facilities. SENATOR TAYLOR said most people who go out on their own and get their GED do it while they are feeding their kids, doing the laundry and going to work everyday. They get a couple of books, take them home, work on them in the house and they cannot afford a computer. He said for somebody to suggest to the committee that some poor prisoner, who had a sex violation, might not be able to do his entire sex violators treatment program and still be able to get a GED too was kind of tough to swallow. He commented on the current policy within DOC attempting to comply with Judge Hunt's order on housing. He said it is a standard higher than most any other state had. He could not believe the level of travel and transportation and how many hours of State Trooper time was being wasted as they bounced prisoners from one facility to another based upon how many came in the night before. He said it was a bazaar situation and he had yet to see the Administration put in one single bill to build a prison. TAPE 02-04 SIDE A MR. RICHARDS said Senator Taylor's comment, that there had been no leadership by the governor and no bill had been put forward, there actually had been Regional Correction Expansion bills introduced by the governor in the past. Some of those turned out, they have a new Anchorage jail opening up this year. MR. RICHARDS pointed out that the majority of business in DOC takes place in the Anchorage bowl area. Most of those people are pre-trial inmates and they only have a limited number of bed spaces for those people. In order to get people through the judicial system and through the process they need to be in that location. Some of those people don't stay where they are because their court dates may be far enough down the road that they can move them out to Palmer or down to Wildwood because there are new people coming in. SENATOR TAYLOR said he understood that. He appreciated the clarification of it because he had painted with too broad a brush on that. He understood that is the biggest part of the population that has to keep moving. ROSE MUNAFO, Criminal Justice Planner Department of Corrections, said Senator Donley had mentioned they might not need to do the test of adult basic education. She believed he felt the inmates would be required to provide them with documentation of their educational level but the reason they do that test is because it is a requirement by the GED testing service. When they enroll anyone in Adult Basic Education classes they have to do a base line evaluation of their educational level. SENATOR DONLEY said the fiscal note assumes there are 200 new inmates, 8% are incapable and 35% already have their GEDs so they are going to have 111 to test. DOC is already testing some of those so why would they have to have the full $5500 for 111 if they are already doing that process, for example, at Spring Creek for all of them. MR. RICHARDS said they are anticipating increased participation in the GED program because of this legislation for people who are rd going to want to get the full 1/3 good time. Which would result in an additional test that they probably would not be providing. MS. MUNAFO said it costs roughly $50 per person. SENATOR TAYLOR said that made good sense because there may very well be a resident body of people within the institutions that would then want to participate. He asked if the population in their institutions was, 3500 or 4000. MR. RICHARDS said there were approximately 4600 people in custody. SENATOR DONLEY said he was all for them applying for a GED and getting an education but this bill would not be an incentive towards people already in just for new people. If it inspired the existing people, that would be wonderful. MS. MUNAFO said she did the program management for inmate education and a few other programs so that is why she was there. SENATOR TAYLOR thanked her and said he believed one of the greatest aspects of rehabilitation they can offer to people who are incarcerated is to get them some education and get them the ability to read and write and maybe they will be able to handle their lives a little better when they get out. He appreciated what the people with DOC were doing. SENATOR DONLEY told Ms. Munafo his staff would be in contact with her to try and work out a new fiscal note based on the new Committee Substitute. SENATOR DONLEY made the motion to move CSSSSB 223 (JUD), the newly adopted J version from committee with individual recommendations. SENATOR TAYLOR said the record should note Senator Ellis had left but they still had a quorum. SENATOR THERRIAULT said that is with a new fiscal note. SENATOR TAYLOR hearing no objection moved CSSSSB 223 (JUD) from committee with individual recommendations and with a new fiscal note as testified to. Meeting was adjourned at 3:15 p.m.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|